🌿 Participation to Permission
An explainer based on the Women Golfers Participation Survey (UK, 2020)
This page sits within the Systems & Structures work of the Women’s Golf History Project. It brings together contemporary participation evidence and long-standing historical patterns to explain a recurring dynamic in women’s golf — and, by extension, in amateur and community sport more broadly.
Context
In November 2020, a UK-wide survey was conducted to understand how women participate in competitive golf, what formats they play, and what opportunities they would like to see. The survey focused on women who already compete — across ages, handicaps, and competitive levels — and combined quantitative data with open qualitative responses.
The findings were clear. Women are actively engaged in competitive golf and express strong, reasoned demand for a wide range of formats and pathways, including one-day and multi-day events, team competitions, regional and national structures, and the concept of a national women’s league. Where participation is constrained, the barriers are structural rather than motivational, shaped by access, timing, and limited authorised provision.
What this explainer examines
This explainer looks beyond participation itself to examine what happens after demand is expressed.
Drawing on the 2020 survey and on wider historical evidence explored throughout the Systems & Structures section, it outlines a recurring governance pattern in women’s golf:
-
Participation is encouraged
-
Informal self-organisation is often tolerated
-
Resistance emerges when women attempt to formalise, scale, or lead new structures
Importantly, this resistance is rarely procedural or explicit. It more often takes informal and social forms — withdrawal of support, boundary-setting, or the quiet signalling of what is and is not “appropriate”. Because it is not codified, it can be difficult to see, name, or challenge.
Why women’s golf matters here
Women’s golf is presented not as an exception and not as an indictment, but as a case study.
Its long history, layered governance, and well-documented participation make visible dynamics that are often harder to observe elsewhere. Across generations, women have repeatedly built parallel systems, sustained competition, and carried the game forward — while encountering limits when informal organisation seeks formal recognition or authority.
Understanding this pattern helps explain why enthusiasm and evidence do not always translate into durable structures, and why capable organisers and future leaders can quietly disengage even in apparently healthy participation environments.
Beyond golf
While this explainer is grounded firmly in women’s golf, the pattern it describes is not unique. As sport is increasingly expected to contribute to health, wellbeing, inclusion, and longevity, the relationship between participation and agency becomes critical.
Women’s golf offers a lens through which the limits of participation-only approaches can be seen clearly. Recognising these dynamics is essential if sport is to retain people, support leadership, and fulfil its wider social role.
How to read this video
The video below is offered as a reflective explainer.
It is not advocacy and not a call to action.
Its purpose is to support understanding and to provide language for patterns that many experience but struggle to articulate.
🌿 Listening to Women’s Voices (Qualitative Findings)
The survey included open-text questions to understand women’s lived experience of competitive golf — not just what women play, but how the system feels, where it constrains, and what women wish existed.
These responses are anonymous. They are presented here to honour participant voice and to make visible the patterns that statistics alone cannot show.
The purpose of this qualitative layer is not to highlight individual stories, but to surface recurring structural signals — the moments where women describe access limits, timing constraints, invisible boundaries, and the quiet normalisation of “how things are done”.
How we read the comments (method)
The comments were reviewed using a consistent coding frame to ensure clarity and restraint. Themes were grouped under:
-
Access & Timing (weekday bias, work/family constraints, travel/cost)
-
Format Desire (team vs individual, one-day vs multi-day, scratch/handicap, age bands)
-
Provision Gap (participation vs availability)
-
Structural Friction (barriers that are social or systemic rather than logistical)
-
Legitimacy & Authority (who is “allowed” to organise; informal permission structures)
-
Self-Organisation (societies, friend networks, informal competitions)
-
Belonging & Community (welcome, inclusion, social safety)
-
Normalisation of Limitation (gratitude for minimal provision; lowered expectations)
-
Energy & Readiness (willingness to play, volunteer, join leagues)
This frame keeps the focus on systems rather than personalities.
Quantitative Results — Participation Patterns
The quantitative results from the Women Golfers Participation Survey (UK, November 2020) provide important context for the qualitative responses that follow. They show how women are already participating in competitive golf across ages, handicaps, and formats, and where demand exists for additional opportunities. These figures do not stand alone; they help situate women’s open-text comments within a clear participation reality, demonstrating that expressed frustrations and aspirations arise from active engagement rather than disengagement or lack of interest. Read together, the quantitative patterns and qualitative voices offer a grounded picture of participation shaped by structure, access, and opportunity.
🌿 Listening to Women’s Voices (Qualitative Responses)
Alongside structured survey questions, the Women Golfers Participation Survey (UK, November 2020) invited respondents to share open-text comments about their experiences of competitive golf — what they play, what they struggle with, and what they feel is missing.
These responses are anonymous. They are shared here to preserve participant voice and to make visible the patterns that emerge when women describe the system in their own words.
The purpose of presenting these comments is not to foreground individual stories, but to allow readers to see the recurring structural signals that appear across many responses — particularly around access, timing, opportunity, and informal limits on organisation and leadership.
How these comments are intended to be read
At this stage, the comments are presented as a listening layer, not as a finished analytical product.
They are not offered as:
-
representative of all women golfers
-
statistically weighted findings
-
or definitive conclusions
Instead, they function as primary qualitative material that supports the participation patterns identified in the survey and informs the wider Systems & Structures analysis within the Women’s Golf History Project.
A consistent thematic coding frame has been developed and is being used internally to read these responses at a structural level. Future synthesis may surface aggregated themes, but the comments are shared here in their raw form for transparency.
Qualitative responses (embedded)
The embedded sheet below contains the anonymised open-text responses provided by survey participants. Comments are grouped by question to preserve context.
Notes on use and ethics
-
All responses are anonymous
-
No identifying details have been included
-
The material is shared for learning, reflection, and structural understanding
If you wish to reference this material in research, governance discussions, or programme design, please cite the Women’s Golf History Project and the Women Golfers Participation Survey (UK, November 2020).