Skip to content

Overview

When the Ladies’ Golf Union (LGU) was founded in April 1893, the Council structure adopted by the delegates included four male Vice Presidents, each assigned to represent one of the home-nation regions: England (South), England (North), Scotland, and Ireland. MSU Libraries

Their presence did not signal male control of the LGU. Contemporary evidence shows that direction of affairs, continuity, and operational labour sat with women officers—most notably Issette Pearson as Honorary Secretary (1893–1919), supported by women administrators and committee “aides-de-camp.” (See Golfing Reminiscences, pp. 233–245 — your locked extracts.)

Instead, these Vice Presidents functioned primarily as:

  • External legitimacy in a male-governed golf culture

  • Public endorsement at the moment of formation

  • Regional bridging across the four nations

The Four Vice Presidents Named at Foundation

At the founding meeting, the motion was carried (subject to acceptance) naming:

  • Mr. W. Laidlaw PurvesEngland, South

  • Mr. Talbot FairEngland, North

  • Mr. H. S. C. EverardScotland

  • Mr. T. GilroyIreland MSU Libraries

What “Vice President” Meant in Practice

What it was: honorary stature, public support, institutional bridging.
What it was not: executive direction of the LGU’s affairs.

One Vice President is described in Golfing Reminiscences in terms of interest and support (not governance): “he took the deepest interest in all that concerned women’s golf” (Purves; pp. 238–239).

Individual Profiles

1) Mr. W. Laidlaw Purves (England, South)

Why he mattered at foundation

Purves chaired the founding meeting and was described in contemporary reporting as an exceptionally experienced and respected golfer, elected chairman unanimously. MSU Libraries

Impact (what we can evidence safely)

  • Chairing and endorsement at inception: chaired the founding meeting and supported the formation of a representative Union. MSU Libraries

  • Public legitimacy: a recognised figure in late-Victorian golf, helping the LGU be taken seriously at launch. MSU Libraries+1

  • Supportive (not operational) stance in later memory: described as the first Vice President who took “deepest interest” in women’s golf (Stringer, pp. 238–239 — your extract).

Short identifier (for the page sidebar / quick list)

Scottish-born surgeon and influential golfer associated with the establishment of the LGU; also linked with Royal St George’s. Wikipedia

2) Mr. Talbot Fair (England, North)

Why he mattered at foundation

Talbot Fair represented Lytham & St Annes, which had already arranged the first championship dates (June 1893). He participated in the founding meeting discussions and is explicitly named as Vice President for the North of England. MSU Libraries

Impact (evidenced examples)

  • Championship problem-solving: engaged in the resolution that the LGU would take up management of the championship, avoiding competing “two championships” arrangements. MSU Libraries

  • Administrative engagement beyond title: appears in later reporting proposing or bringing forward changes to championship regulations at an AGM (e.g., 1894). MSU Libraries

  • Long-running organiser in the Lytham/St Annes golf ecosystem: described in period reporting as instrumental in club formation and sustained secretaryship. British Newspaper Archive+1

  • Visibility over time: reported as presiding at an LGU council meeting (1907), indicating continued association/standing. trove.nla.gov.au

Important WGH nuance

Fair’s visibility is real, but it sits alongside (and does not override) the LGU’s women-led executive work. Your locked Stringer extracts keep that boundary clear.

3) Mr. H. S. C. Everard (Scotland)

Why he mattered at foundation

Everard was named as Vice President for Scotland at the founding meeting. MSU Libraries

Impact (what we can evidence)

  • Cultural and institutional connection to St Andrews golf: Everard was a known golf writer and competitor associated with St Andrews and wrote major works on golf (including on the Royal & Ancient Club). Wikipedia

  • Credibility effect: his appointment signalled that recognised voices within Scottish golf were willing to publicly endorse a women-led governing body at the moment it formed. (This is an inference grounded in his documented profile and the founding structure.) Wikipedia+1

4) Mr. Thomas Gilroy (Ireland)

Why he mattered at foundation

Gilroy was named Vice President representing Ireland at the LGU’s inception. MSU Libraries

Impact (evidenced)

  • Four-nations framing at inception: his appointment embedded Ireland into the LGU’s founding structure (even as Ireland would soon develop its own women’s union). MSU Libraries

  • Established standing in Irish golf circles: documented as representing an Irish club (Royal Dublin) at major championships and as a figure active in Irish golf administration/history. Irish Golf Archive+1

What Their Inclusion Reveals

The founding Vice Presidents are best understood as structural signals:

  • women built the governance;

  • male figures were positioned at the perimeter to help the new body be recognised in the wider golf world.

That distinction is precisely what your Stringer extracts evidence: direction of affairs and smooth running are described through women’s roles, while vice-presidential presence appears as interest and endorsement.

Evidence Base

Primary: Golfing Reminiscences (Mabel Stringer, 1924), pp. 233–245 (your locked extracts: Pearson’s direction of affairs; women’s operational labour; Purves’ “deepest interest”).
Contemporary report of foundation: “GOLF” periodical report (April 28, 1893) listing the four Vice Presidents and their regions and recording Purves chairing the meeting. MSU Libraries
Supplementary biographies/contexts: Purves profile. Wikipedia Everard profile. Wikipedia Gilroy profile. Irish Golf Archive Additional Talbot Fair references. British Newspaper Archive+2MSU Libraries+2

Impact Summary — What the Male Vice Presidents Contributed (and What They Did Not)

The appointment of male Vice Presidents at the founding of the Ladies’ Golf Union in 1893 had real impact, but that impact was contextual rather than executive.

What they contributed

  • Public legitimacy at inception: The presence of respected male figures helped the new Union be recognised within a male-governed golfing world at the moment of its formation.

  • Procedural support: Figures such as Laidlaw Purves chaired meetings and lent authority to formal proceedings, enabling women’s decisions to be publicly ratified rather than challenged.

  • Four-nation framing: Vice Presidents representing England (North and South), Scotland, and Ireland signalled that women’s golf governance was conceived as national and inter-regional from the outset.

What they did not do

  • They did not direct policy, administer competitions, or manage the Union’s affairs.

  • They did not provide continuity, day-to-day labour, or organisational leadership.

  • They did not substitute for women’s authority within the LGU.

Where authority truly lay
Contemporary and retrospective evidence consistently locates governance, judgement, and continuity with women officers—most notably Issette Pearson, who “assumed the direction of affairs” from 1893 and sustained the Union’s operation for more than twenty-five years.

Why this distinction matters
The Vice Presidents’ roles illustrate the social negotiation required for women to institutionalise sport in the late nineteenth century. Women built and ran the governing system; male figures were positioned at its edge to secure recognition. Understanding this boundary allows the LGU to be recognised accurately as a women-led governing body, operating strategically within the constraints of its time.

This page explains how women secured public legitimacy for national governance in 1893 without ceding authority — a pattern that would shape women’s golf for decades.

Back To Top